Iryna HOTSYNETS,
\nPhD (Philology), Associate professor of Pedagogic and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University
\n24, Ivan Franko st, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine;
\nEmail: hotsynets@ukr.net
\nhttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8201-2712<\/p>\n
Heading<\/strong>: Linguosophy of the modern of the Ukrainian prose text Abstract:<\/strong> In the article on the material of L. Daien\u2019s documentary story \u201cChornobyl is a bitter grass\u201d the actualization and dynamics of language signs of the Chornobyl era in the context of the development of a specific \u201cChornobyl\u201d dictionary is traced. This is in line with the needs of the verbalization of the topic of the technogenic accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power station, relevant to Ukrainian society.<\/p>\n The mechanisms of the expressive development of Chornobyl\u2019s own name are highlighted.<\/p>\n The types of substantive-evaluative transformation of traditional images that fall into the semantic action of the Chornobyl nomination are noted.<\/p>\n The objects of analysis were temporally and thematically marked vocabulary and phraseology, as well as stylistic methods of creating the image of the Chornobyl disaster. In particular, it emphasizes the peculiarities of contextual development of terminological units \u2013 zone, atom, radiation, radiation<\/strong>, etc. The types of their semantic-evaluative transformation as they enter the documentary text are clarified.<\/p>\n The journalistic rhetoric of the linguistic description of the Chornobyl events, especially the linguistic portrayal of the liquidators of the consequences of the Ch\u043ernobyl accident, was emphasized.<\/p>\n Thus, the language of L.\u00a0Daien\u2019s documentary story \u201cChornobyl is a bitter grass\u201d illustrates the social and psychological situation at the Chornobyl nuclear power station on the night of a man-made disaster. The verbalization of this topic is subordinated to the specific Ch\u043ernobyl vocabulary, which reflects the entry into the common practice of narrowly specialized terms (atom, atomic, radiation, radioactive<\/em>), and also attests to the expansion of the semantic volume of units, \u201cinvolved\u201d. Understood in the context of contemporary reading of documentary prose, they are perceived as linguistic signs of the Ch\u043ernobyl era.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Keywords<\/strong>: language sign, Chornobyl nomination, Chornobyl dictionary, semantic structure of nomination, extension of semantic volume, axiological content, epithet, metaphor.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\nLanguage<\/strong>: Ukrainian<\/p>\nREFERENCES<\/h5>\n
\n
\n