{"id":10498,"date":"2021-11-23T12:13:04","date_gmt":"2021-11-23T10:13:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/?page_id=10498"},"modified":"2022-01-12T14:59:50","modified_gmt":"2022-01-12T12:59:50","slug":"english-typology-of-phraseological-units-with-anthroponym-component","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/vypusky-zhurnalu\/2021-2\/zbirnyk-kultura-slova-94-2021\/english-typology-of-phraseological-units-with-anthroponym-component.html","title":{"rendered":"TYPOLOGY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH ANTHROPONYM COMPONENT"},"content":{"rendered":"<strong>Mykola PELYPAS,<\/strong><br \/>\nCandidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Ukrainian Philology of the Institute of Philology of V.I.\u00a0Vernadsky Crimean Federal University.<br \/>\nVernadsky Avenue, 4, Simferopol, 295007<br \/>\nE-mail:\u00a0 <a href=\"mailto:p_shkola@mail.ru\">p_shkola@mail.ru<\/a><br \/>\nORCID: <a href=\"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9016-0635\">https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9016-0635<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Heading:<\/strong>\u00a0from history of culture and written language<br \/>\n<strong>Language:<\/strong>\u00a0Ukrainian<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><br \/>\nThe article is dedicated to the study of phraseological units with an anthroponym component in the Ukrainian language. In particular, it is noted that this phraseological microsystem was never studied within the Ukrainian language as a separate subject, but only in conjunction with studying phraseological units with a proper name component in general.<br \/>\nThe analysis carried out makes it possible to single out three main groups of phraseological units with an anthroponym component depending on origin: 1) those with commonly used anthroponyms, male names in most cases; 2) those with anthroponyms of biblical origin; and 3) those with anthroponyms of mythological origin.<br \/>\nOn the basis of semantic features, nine most essential groups were identified in this phraseological microsystem. It is emphasized that the absolute majority of phraseological units with an anthroponym component are associated with a description of a person, his character traits, mental processes, actions and states, etc. A significant part of the phraseological units within this microsystem characterize abstract concepts and various situations, and only a small number of them are used to designate material merits or, vice versa, shortcomings of a person, his behavior, actions, etc.<br \/>\nA structural-syntactic analysis of phraseological units with an anthroponym component is also carried out. It is stated that in terms of structure, the lion\u2019s share of phraseological units of this microsystem correspond to a word combination with a subordinate connection to a greater extent, and with a coordinative connection to a lesser extent. A part of phraseological units with an anthroponym component also correspond to a combination of words, a common figure of speech and a subordinate clause of a complex sentence. The models used to construct phraseological units with an anthroponym component are described in detail.<br \/>\nThe factual phraseological material indicates that variance is a nontypical phenomenon for the phraseological units of the analyzed microsystem, especially for phraseological units with an anthroponym component of biblical origin and the same units of mythological origin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>phraseological unit, phraseological macro- and microsystems, typology, anthroponym, semantics, syntactic structure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Hamaniuk V., Mishenina T. Frazeolohizmy z onomastychnym komponentom yak reprezentanty natsionalnoi kultury (nimetsko-ukrainski paraleli). FilolohicREhni studii: Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu \/ Philological Studies: Scientific Bulletin of Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University. 2019. T. 20. S. 29\u201354.<\/li>\n<li>Diadechko L. P. \u00abAdamiv slid\u00bb v ukrainskii frazeolohii. Ukrainske movoznavstvo: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2011. \u2116 41. S. 18\u201323.<\/li>\n<li>Dudka V. I. Stanovlennia ta rozvytok frazeosemantychnoho polia \u00abradist\u00bb i \u00abhore\u00bb v nimetskii movi (dosvid diakhronichnoho doslidzhennia): avtoref. dys. \u2026 kand. filol. nauk. Kyiv, 1994. 16 s.<\/li>\n<li>Koloiz Zh. V. Slovo Blahovisti: Slovnyk-dovidnyk frazem bibliinoho pokhodzhennia. Kryvyi Rih: TOV \u00abUran 2000\u00bb, 2001. 200 s.<\/li>\n<li>Kuza A. Typolohiia relihiinykh frazeolohichnykh odynyts: henetychni ta strukturno-semantychni hrupy. Problemy humanitarnykh nauk. Seriia \u00abFilolohiia\u00bb. 2017. Vyp. 40. S. 53\u201365.<\/li>\n<li>Moroz O. A. Onomastychna frazeolohiia v ukrainskii ta polskii movakh v natsionalno-kulturnomu slov\u2019ianskomu prostori. Naukovi pratsi. Filolohiia. Movoznavstvo. 2016. Vyp. 66. T. 278. S. 77\u201381.<\/li>\n<li>Pradid Yu. F. Frazeolohichna ideohrafiia (problematyka doslidzhen). Kyiv-Simferopol, 1997. 252 s.<\/li>\n<li>Redyn P. A. Frazeolohyzm\u044b z prostranstvenn\u044bm y vremenn\u044bm znachenyem v sovremennom ukraynskom yaz\u044bke: avtoref. dys. \u2026 kand. fylol. nauk. Kharkov, 1989. 24 s.<\/li>\n<li>Skrypnyk L. H. Vlasni nazvy v ukrainskii narodnii frazeolohii. Movoznavstvo. 1970. \u2116 2. S. 54\u201266.<\/li>\n<\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mykola PELYPAS, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Ukrainian Philology of the Institute of Philology of V.I.\u00a0Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Vernadsky Avenue, 4, Simferopol, 295007 E-mail:\u00a0 p_shkola@mail.ru ORCID: https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9016-0635 Heading:\u00a0from history of culture and written language Language:\u00a0Ukrainian Abstract The article is dedicated to the study of phraseological units with an [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":10419,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-doi.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-10498","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10498"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10761,"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10498\/revisions\/10761"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ks.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}