Kateryna LEVCHENKO,
Doctor of Law, Professor, Government Commissioner for Gender Policy,
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine;
12/2 Mykhaila Hrushevskoho St., Kyiv 01008, Ukraine;
e-mail: levchenko@kmu.gov.ua
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-7362
Heading: REVIEW
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract
This review presents a critical analysis of the collective monograph “Strategic Communications in Wartime: From Volunteer Experience to Academic Reflection” (Kyiv, 2024) as a significant contribution to the development of the theoretical and methodological foundations of interdisciplinary research on strategic communications in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Particular attention is devoted to the chapters examining the linguistic dimensions of this complex research field. The review argues that the monograph develops a coherent conceptual framework for understanding the technological dimension of wartime discourse, in which language functions not only as a means of communication but also as an instrument of cognitive influence, cultural meaning-making, strategic narrative construction, collective identity formation, and the enhancement of national resilience. It traces the internal logic of the contributors’ approaches, progressing from a psycholinguistic analysis of the cognitive mechanisms of linguistic influence through a cultural-semiotic interpretation of the symbolic space of war and a pragmatic-linguistic analysis of strategic communications to a political-linguistic understanding of language security as an integral component of national security. The review demonstrates that, taken together, the studies presented in the monograph establish a new interdisciplinary framework for the analysis of wartime discourse by integrating insights from cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, discourse studies, cultural linguistics, sociolinguistics, and security studies.
Key words: wartime discourse, strategic communications, psycholinguistics, discourse studies, linguoculturology, political linguistics, strategic narratives.
REFERENCES