Language signs of the Chornobyl age in L. Dayenʼsnovel «Chornobyl is a Bitter Grass»
Culture of the word, 2019, № 90
UDC 811.161.2’42
Iryna HOTSYNETS,
PhD (Philology), Associate professor of Pedagogic and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University
24, Ivan Franko st, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine;
Email: hotsynets@ukr.net
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-2712
Heading: Linguosophy of the modern of the Ukrainian prose text
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: In the article on the material of L. Daien’s documentary story “Chornobyl is a bitter grass” the actualization and dynamics of language signs of the Chornobyl era in the context of the development of a specific “Chornobyl” dictionary is traced. This is in line with the needs of the verbalization of the topic of the technogenic accident at the Chornobyl nuclear power station, relevant to Ukrainian society.
The mechanisms of the expressive development of Chornobyl’s own name are highlighted.
The types of substantive-evaluative transformation of traditional images that fall into the semantic action of the Chornobyl nomination are noted.
The objects of analysis were temporally and thematically marked vocabulary and phraseology, as well as stylistic methods of creating the image of the Chornobyl disaster. In particular, it emphasizes the peculiarities of contextual development of terminological units – zone, atom, radiation, radiation, etc. The types of their semantic-evaluative transformation as they enter the documentary text are clarified.
The journalistic rhetoric of the linguistic description of the Chornobyl events, especially the linguistic portrayal of the liquidators of the consequences of the Chоrnobyl accident, was emphasized.
Thus, the language of L. Daien’s documentary story “Chornobyl is a bitter grass” illustrates the social and psychological situation at the Chornobyl nuclear power station on the night of a man-made disaster. The verbalization of this topic is subordinated to the specific Chоrnobyl vocabulary, which reflects the entry into the common practice of narrowly specialized terms (atom, atomic, radiation, radioactive), and also attests to the expansion of the semantic volume of units, “involved”. Understood in the context of contemporary reading of documentary prose, they are perceived as linguistic signs of the Chоrnobyl era.
Keywords: language sign, Chornobyl nomination, Chornobyl dictionary, semantic structure of nomination, extension of semantic volume, axiological content, epithet, metaphor.
REFERENCES
- Boiko, L. (1988). Documentary and artistic epic of Chоrnobyl. Radianske literaturoznavstvo, 3, 3 – 20 (in Ukr.)Daiеn, L. (1988). Chоrnobyl is a bitter grass. Kyiv: Veselka (in Ukr.)
- Yermolenko, S. Ya. (2009). Linguistic and aesthetic signs of Ukrainian culture. Kyiv: Instytut ukrainskoi movy NAN Ukrainy (in Ukr.)
- Soroka, M. (2018). Autographs of the heart of Leonid Daien. URL: https://dt.ua/personalities/avtografi-sercya-leonida-dayena-266607_.html (Accessed 19.01.2018) (in Ukr.).
- Sіuta, H. M. (2007). Chоrnobyl is a constant of the Ukrainian linguistic-poetic consciousness. Movoznavstvo, 4 – 5, 44 – 49 (in Ukr.).