TOWARD THE QUESTION ON THE TERMS OF «POTEBNIANSTVO» AND «NEOPOTEBNIANSTVO» IN THE HUMANITARIAN SCIENCE

Culture of the word, 2018, № 89

UDC 81-119

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-8421

Olha CHEREMSKA,

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Prof. Head of the Department of Ukrainian studies and language training for foreign nationals Semen Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics,

9-A Nauky Ave., Kharkiv 61166, Ukraine
Е-mail: olha.cheremska@hneu.net

Heading: Term and present
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article examines the question of appearance and functionality of the term of potebniansntvo. The lexical and semantical options of the name of potebnianstvo, its modern interpretation and understanding. The definition of this term according to the lexicographical sources has been analyzed. The meaning of the concept word potebnianstvo in the interpretations of apprenticies, followers and adherents of Potebnia’s scientific views has been identified.

It has been accentuated on the history of appearance of this term rooted in multilateral personality of O.O. Potebnia himself on the one hand, and on the history of the Kharkiv Philological School on the other hand.

On the basis of materials from thePotebnians’ memoirs (A.H. Hornfeld, V.I. Khartsiev, D.I. Bahalii, D.I. Ovsianyko-Kulykovskyi, M.F. Sumtsov, O.V. Vetukhov), features of the scientific and pedagogical creativity of O.O. Potebnia have been characterized and theoretical and methodological aspects of multilateral activity of the scholar, that laid as the basis of his scientific school, which received the name of potebnianstvo, have been outlined.

The primary meaning of potebnianstvo, originaly invented and interpreted in the scientific works of O.V. Vetukhov (“Potebnianstvo” (1923), “Acad. M. Sumtsov and potebnianstvo” (1926), D. Bahalii “Oleksandr Opanasovych Potebnia” (1924), M. Sumtsov “Do istorii naukovoho vplyvu O.O. Potebni” (1926)) has been revealed and its semantical content – spiritual basis, the development of scientific ideas of O. O. Potebnia, the scientific legacy of O.O. Potebnia, scientific school of O.O. Potebnia – has been identified.

The evolution of the term of potebnianstvo after the 1930s, when, due to the world-picture and ideological tendencies, it was removed from the scientific discourse and became negativelly treated, has been traced.

It has been stressed that the concept word of potebnianstvo was used by apprenticies, followers and adherents of O. O. Potebnia’s scientific views as the expression of the master’s circle and using of the master’s ideas in an interpretation of new elements of the humanitarian knowledge. The meaning of the concept word of neopotebnianstvo used in the modern literature studies has been identified.

Key words: O.O. Potebnia, potebnianstvo, neopotebnianstvo, the Kharkiv Philological School.

REFERENCES

Bagalii, D. (1924). Oleksandr Opanasovych Potebnia: Zahalna kharakterystyka: (Promova na urochystykh zborakh Khark. INO v 32 rokovyny smerti Potebni) [Alexander Opanasovich Potebnja: General characteristics: (Speech at the solemn meeting of Kharkiv, INO on the 32th anniversary of the death of Potebni)]. Chervonyi shliakh, № 4–5, s. 143–159. (In Ukr.).

Vetukhov, A. 1923. Potebnyanstvo [Potebnianstvo]. Rodnoi yazyk v shkole, Kn. 1, s. 110–116; Kn. 2, s. 106–108. (In Rus.).

Horbach, O. (1970). Potebnianstvo [Potebnianstvo]. Entsyklopediia ukrainoznavstva. Paryzh, Niu-York, Vol. 6, s. 2279. (In Ukr.).

Kardash, I. M. (2009). Tvorchyj rozvytok filologichnoyi spadshhyny O. Potebni v suchasnij lingvodydaktyci [Creative development of philological heritage O. Pobetny in modern linguodidactics]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis… kand. ped. nauk: 13.00.02. Pivdennoukrayinskyj derzh. pedagogichnyj un-t im. K. D. Ushynskogo (In Ukr.).

LE 1934. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya [Literary Encyclopedia] : [v 11 t.], gl. red. A.V. Lunacharskiy, V.M. Friche, T.7.URL http://niv.ru/doc/dictionary/literary-encyclopedia/articles/188/metody-domarksistskogo-literaturovedeniya.htm.(Date of the application 20.04.2019). (In Rus.).

http://niv.ru/doc/dictionary/literary-encyclopedia/articles/188/metody-domarksistskogo-literaturovedeniya.htm

Presnyakov, O. P. (1978). A. A. Potebnya i russkoye literaturovedeniye kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka [Potebnya and Russian literary criticism of the late XIX – early XX century]. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo un-ta (In Rus.).

Potebnia, O. (1996). Dumka i mova (fragmenty) [Thought and language (fragments)]. Slovo. Znak. Dyskurs. Antologiya svitovoyi literaturno-krytychnoyi dumky XX st. Lviv: Litopys, s. 25–39 (In Ukr.).

Sinchenko, O. (2015). Neopotebnyanstvo Borysa Navroczkogo [Neopotebnianstvo Boris Navrotsky]. Synopsys: tekst, kontekst, media, № 2.URL:http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stkm_2015_2_4. (Date of the application 18.01.2019). (In Ukr.).

Sumtsov, M. (1923). Veleten dumky i slova [Giant thoughts and words]. Kharkiv (In Ukr.).

Tymoshenko, Yu. (2000). Koncepciya rozuminnya Xarkivskoyi shkoly O. Potebni na tli evolyuciyi receptyvno-germenevtychny`x idej [Concept of understanding of O. Potebni’s Kharkiv school on the background of the evolution of receptive-hermeneutic ideas]. Visnyk Kharkivskogo universytetu, № 491, s. 173 (In Ukr.).

(USE) 1999. Universalnyi slovnyk-entsyklopediia [Elektronnyi resurs] [Universal Dictionary-Encyclopedia] red. M.V. Popovych. URL: http://slovopedia.org.ua/29/53392-0.html (Date of the application 20.05.2019). (In Ukr.).

Fizer, I. (1996). Psyxolingvistychna teoriya literatury Oleksandra Potebni: Metakrytychne doslidzhennya [Psycholinguistic theory of literature by Alexander Potebnia: Metacritical study]. Kiev: AT «Oberegy» URL:http://1576.ua/uploads/files/6496/Fizer_I.Psikholingvistichna_teoirya_l_ri_Potebni.1576.ua.pdf (Date of the application 18.01.2019). (In Ukr.).

FS 1986. Filosofskyi slovnyk [PhilosophicalDictionary], za red. V.I. Shynkaruka. Kyiv: Holov. Red. URE. (In Ukr.).

Cheremska, O.S. (2018). Filologichna shkola Oleksandra Potebni v ocinci Oleksiya Vetukhova [Philological School of Alexander Potebnia in the Evaluation of Alexei Vetukhov]. Ukrayinska mova, №4, s. 112–124. (In Ukr.).