• info@ks.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278-42-81
  • Print ISSN 0201-419Х
  • e-ISSN 2708-9827
» Journal Issues » 2021 » Journal "Culture Of The Word"- №94, 2021 » Linguistic landscape of documentary movies about Pavlo Zahrebelnyi

Linguistic landscape of documentary movies about Pavlo Zahrebelnyi

Journal “Culture Of The Word”- №94, 2021
УДК 81’38

Anhelina GANZHA,
PhD in Philology, Senior researcher of the Department of stylistics, language culture and sociolinguistics,
Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine;
4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine;
e-mail: ganzhalina@ukr.net
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-5306

Heading: THE CITY IN UKRAINIAN LINGUOCULTURE: THE ECHO OF GENERATIONS

Language: Ukrainian

Abstract

The article proposes the author’s definition of the term “language landscape of a documentary film”. Testing the validity of the definition and its components was carried out on the basis of documentary media products about P.A. Zahrebelnyi: documentaries «P.A. Zahrebelnyi. To the question» (2014), «P.A. Zahrebelnyi. Sonnet 29» (2000), TV programs «Miracle Keys of P.A. Zahrebelnyi» (2009).
The heuristic value of studying the linguistic landscape of a documentary film lies in the special focus of the analysis. The linguistic space of modern documentary nowadays often becomes multilingual, some elements of this are recorded in the analyzed media products about P.A. Zahrebelnyi. Although in general there is reason to talk about the “monophonic” type of language landscape (representation in Ukrainian).
In documentaries, the symbolic function of the language landscape is projected not only on national identity, but also on the background cultural experience of the potential audience of media products.

Key words: scientific metaphor, linguistic landscape, documentary film, media product, symbolic function,  P. Zahrebelnyi.

REFERENCES

  1. Belei, L. (2010). Sociolinguistic coverage of the term “language landscape”. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho un-tu. Seriia: Filolohiia. Sotsialni komunikatsii, 23, 36–40. Uzhhorod: Hoverla (in Ukr.).
  2. Belei, L. (2019). Ukrainian language at the beginning of the XXI century: Parameterization of socio-linguistic changes. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  3. Kasian, L. H. (2014) Spiritual continent named Pavlo Zahrebelnyi. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 4-5, 190-203 (in Ukr.)
  4. Nepsha,S. (2021) Landscape as a Category of Film Aesthetics: Key Approaches. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, vol. 21, 4,  111–121 (in Rus.).
  5. Oliinyk, O. Yu. (2013). Terminology of language landscape description in domestic and foreign linguistics. Terminolohichnyi visnyk. 2(1),. 150–154 (in Ukr.).
  6. Peshkova, N.P. (2017). Linguistic landscape of a polyethnic city: Peculiarities of verbal influence. Voprosy psikholingvistiki, 3 (33), 108-121. (in Rus.).
  7. Sokolova, S.O. (2014). Polylingual language landscape of the city in the perception of Kyivans. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu, 48, 406-414 (in Ukr.).