• info@ks.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278-42-81
  • Print ISSN 0201-419Х
  • e-ISSN 2708-9827
» Journal Issues » 2021 » Journal "Culture Of The Word"- №94, 2021 » URBAN LINGUISTICS IN UKRAINE: ATTAINMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF RESEARCHES

URBAN LINGUISTICS IN UKRAINE: ATTAINMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF RESEARCHES

Journal “Culture Of The Word”- №94, 2021
УДК 811.161.2:81’276’373

Olena RUDA ,
PhD in Philology, Head Researcher of the Department of Stylistics, Language Culture and Sociolinguistics,
Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv, 01001
e-mail: olenaruda@yahoo.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2157-193X

Heading: The city in Ukrainian linguoculture: the echo of generations
Language:
Ukrainian

Abstract
The article summarizes the achievements of domestic linguistics in the study of urban speaking. The problems of researching nationally determined urban forms of language communication are outlined. It is emphasized that the analysis of the city language life makes it possible to determine the patterns inherent in the speech behavior of all citizens (universal) and those that are inherent in the language behavior of inhabitants from a particular city that is studied (specific).
The issues of functioning urbanolects, urban koine, as well as advertising, street announcements, graffiti as elements of the city language landscape are considered. The “dictionary” of each city contains everyday vocabulary, professional jargon, argot, slang, foreign language inclusions, urbanonims – the official names of urban objects and their colloquial names. The polemic over the use of the term “prostorichchia” to describe the Ukrainian linguistic space realities is highlighted.
The need for a comprehensive study of nationally determined urban forms of communication in domestic linguistics is substantiated. Thus, the most urgent task of such studies is to create a database of speech material taking into account regional specifics to identify the following structural elements: “Language of a big city”, “Language of a small town”, “Language of the district center”, “Language of the village” etc. For this purpose, it is extremely important to collect material for oral textbooks.
It is emphasized that the speech peculiarities of representatives from different social groups and the level of language proficiency can be studied in groups of respondents with identical sets of ethnolinguistic, gender, professional and other social characteristics using such classical sociolinguistic methods as observation, oral interview, testing, questionnaires, and analysis of written sources. Urban linguistic research should take into account statistical, demographic data and facts of society’s political life.
It is concluded that the urgent task for Ukrainian linguistics is to develop general principles of human settlements’ linguistic typology.

Key words: urban linguistics, urban dialects, urban koine, urbanonims, language portraiture, linguistic landscape, social dialects, street announcements, graffiti.

REFERENCES

  1. Belei, L.L. (2012). The language landscape of the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine at the beginning of the XXI century: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology): Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  2. Belei, L. (2010). Sociolinguistic coverage of the term ‘language landscape’. Scientific bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series “Philology. Social Communications”. 23 (pp. 36 – 40). Uzhhorod (in Ukr.).
  3. Belei, O.O. (1999). Modern Ukrainian ergonomics: proper names of Transcarpathian enterprises. Uzhhorod (in Ukr.).
  4. Belikov, V.Y., Krysin, L.P. (2001). Sociolinguistics: a textbook for universities. Moskva (in Rus.).
  5. Bikova, N.M. (2006). Types of speech behavior in a multilingual situation: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  6. Braha, I.I. (2010). Linguo-socio-cultural space of Sumy. Sociolinguistic studies ( 123 – 128). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  7. Braha, I.I. (2014). The current state of sociolinguistic terminology (about the problem). Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University. Linguistics, Vol. 20 (1) (pp. 22 – 32) (in Ukr.).
  8. Vynnychuk, Yu. (2007). Let’s swear in Lviv style. For you. № 1 (45) (in Ukr.).
  9. Vysotskyi,A. (1976). Medieval inscriptions of St. Sophia of Kiev (based on graffiti materials of the 11th – 17th centuries). Kyiv (in Rus.).
  10. Halai,B. (2008). Ukrainian urbanonims of Transcarpathia in the XX–XXI centuries: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Uzhhorod (in Ukr.).
  11. Horbach, (2006). Argo in Ukraine. Lviv (in Ukr.).
  12. Horozhanov, Yu.Yu. Ergonims of Lutsk: structural-semantic analysis. URL: esnuir.univer.lutsk.ua/bitstream/123456789/2745/3/971-3781-1-PB.pdf (last address:06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  13. Demin, A.A., Kashyn, V.B. (2001). Interaction of language and environment in graffiti texts. Language, communication, social environment, 1, 72 (in Rus.).
  14. Demchenko, V. (2010). Argo as an organic element of the everyday Ukrainian language. Dyvoslovo, 34 – 37 (in Ukr.).
  15. Deremenda, Yu.M. (2011). Metonymic onimization as a means of creating an advertising name. Scientific works of Kamianets-Podilsky National University. Philol. sciences. 28 (pp. 119 – 122). Kamianets-Podilskyi (in Ukr.).
  16. Dyka, L.V. Prostorichchia: violation of the norm or natural development of the Ukrainian language? Scientific notes of NaUKMA. URL: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/1941/Dyka_Prostorichna_leksyka.pdf;jsessionid=E35B7F91629A723FFF2643575E76EAED?sequence=1 (last address:06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  17. Didur,I. (2014). Foreign-language proprial units as an integral part of the ergonomic icons of capitals. Scientific notes. SeriesPhilological sciences (Linguistics). Vol. 129 (pp. 462 – 465). Kirovohrad (in Ukr.).
  18. Yermakova,H. (2010). The phenomenon of graffiti: a kind of deviance or the norm of everyday life? Scientific-theoretical and socio-political almanac “Hrani”, 6 (74), 108 – 110. Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukr.).
  19. Zhelezniak,M. (2014). Kyiv toponymicon. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  20. Zalizniak, H., Masenko, L. (2001). Movna sytuatsiia Kyieva: den sohodnishnii ta pryideshnii. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  21. Zirka, V.V. (2004). Manipulative games in advertising: linguistic aspect: monograph. Dnipropetrovsk (in Rus.).
  22. Zemskaia, E.A., Kytaihorodskaia, M.V. (1984). Observations on colloquial morphology. Urban Speech: Problems of Learning ( 66 – 102). Moskva (in Rus.).
  23. Karpenko,Yu. (2006). Cognitive onomastics as a direction of cognition of proper names. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  24. Karpenko,A. (1984). Russian onomastics. Odesa (in Rus.).
  25. Kirianov, M.V. (2013). Features of political graffiti in the Sverdlovsk and Rovenky, Luhansk region. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Luhansk National University, 11 (270), part I, 241 – 253. Luhansk (in Ukr.).
  26. Kis, R. (2002). Linguo-cultural marginalization in the cities of Ukraine (non-functional vision). Language conflicts and harmonization of society (pp. 55 – 58). Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet (in Ukr.).
  27. Kolodij, B.M. (2009). American slang and some problems of its translation into Ukrainian. Problems of Semantics, Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics. 16 (pp. 234 – 241). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  28. Kornovenko, L.V. (2007). Language portrait of Cherkasy: sphere of service. Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: Philological Sciences. 116 (pp. 3 – 10). Cherkasy (in Ukr.).
  29. Short dictionary of ‘lvivska gvara’. Liuba Kozak (comp.). URL: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n36-1texts/gwara.htm (last address: 06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  30. Kudreiko,O. (2010). Language situation in the cities of Donetsk region: synchronous and diachronic aspects. Sociolinguistic studies (pp. 44 – 51). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  31. Kudreiko,O. (2011). Sociolinguistic portrait of small towns of Donetsk region abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology): Donetsk (in Ukr.).
  32. Kudriavtseva,A. (2001). Russian urban prostorechchie: Kiev-2000. Russian studies. Vol. 1 (pp. 4 – 8). Kyiv (in Rus.).
  33. Kuznietsova, T.V. (1999). The language of the bilingual family in the functional aspect: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  34. Kutuza, N.V. (2003). Structural and semantic models of ergonims (on the material of the ergonomicon of Odesa): abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Odesa (in Ukr.).
  35. Kutsyk, O.A. (2006). Ergonoms of Drohobych: historical and cultural aspect. Slavic Herald. Vol. 6 (pp. 144 – 149). Rivne (in Ukr.).
  36. Larin, B.A. (1977). On the linguistic study of the city. History of the Russian language and general linguistics (selected works) (pp. 189 – 199). Moskva (in Rus.).
  37. Lytvynenko, A. (2007). Chernigiv interviews (About the language and cultural self-identification in the youth center of a Russianized city). Urok ukrainskoi, 7, 8 – 12 (in Ukr.).
  38. Liesovets, N.M. (2007). Ergonomics of Luhansk: structural-semantic and socio-functional aspects: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Luhansk (in Ukr.).
  39. Liashenko, R.O. Dynamics of urbanonims of Kirovograd: research work. URL: http://library.kr.ua/kray/lyashenko.html (last address:06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  40. Martos,A. (2006). Youth slang in the speech structure of Kherson: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Luhansk (in Ukr.).
  41. Martseniuk,O., Rozhdestvenska, O.A. (2009). Gender stereotypes of outdoor advertising (on the example of the Kyiv’s Podil). Scientific notes. Sociological Sciences (pp. 82 – 88) (in Ukr.).
  42. Marchuk, (2010). Linguistic portrait of an intellectual – a resident of Kamianets-Podilskyi. Language and society, 1, 181 – 188. Lviv (in Ukr.).
  43. Masenko, L.T. (2004). Language and Society: The Postcolonial Dimension. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  44. Masenko, L.T. (2006). Ukrainian jargon studies. Ukrainian language and literature, 38, 3 (in Ukr.).
  45. Masenko, L.T. (2008). Ukrainian sociolinguistics: studying the problems of language policy. Ukrainian language, 1, 13 – 23 (in Ukr.).
  46. Matsiuk,P. (2012). Sociolinguistics as an integration direction of research in the modern paradigm: international and Ukrainian experience. Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Vol. 137. Philological Sciences (Linguistics) (pp. 28 – 34) (in Ukr.).
  47. Matsiuk,P. (2010). Modern sociolinguistics: trends in the development of theory and tasks. Language and society, 1, 5 – 20. Lviv (in Ukr.).
  48. Movna, (2008). Oleksa Horbach’s book “Argo in Ukraine” as a source of studying the Lviv dialect of the first third of the ХХ century. Bulletin of Lviv University. Bibliography series. Vol. 3 (pp. 302 – 307). Lviv (in Ukr.).
  49. Movna, (2013). Dictionary of the Lviv dialect of the first third of the XX century. Lviv (in Ukr.).
  50. The linguistic face of the city: Cherkasy – 2007 (2008). Cherkasy (in Ukr.).
  51. Mykolenko, T.M. (2006). Ukrainian city slang (on the material of oral speech of Ternopil residents): abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  52. Oliynyk, O.Yu. (2013). Peculiarities of coexistence and interaction of languages in the language landscape of the city (on the material of Kyiv signs). Scientific notes of the Nizhyn University. Book 1 (pp. 223 – 227) (in Ukr.).
  53. Oliynyk, O.Yu. (2013). Terminology of language landscape description in domestic and foreign linguistics. Terminological bulletin. ( 150 – 154) (in Ukr.).
  54. Otin, Ye. (1993). Nominative processes in Russian ergonomics of XX century (names of industrial enterprises, joint-stock companies and firms). Current issues of language theory and onomastic nomination (pp. 83 – 84). Donetsk (in Rus.).
  55. Otin, Ye. (2004). Dictionary of connotative proper names. Donetsk (in Rus.).
  56. Pashkivsky, A. (1929). ‘Blatny’ words in the circle of Bila Tserkva school youth. Kraieznavstvo, 74 – Harkiv (in Ukr.).
  57. The first dictionary of Ukrainian youth slang (1998). S. Pirkalo; Y. Mosenkis (ed.). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  58. Pidkujmukha, L.M. School jargon in the speech of interwar Lviv. URL: http://linguistics.chdu.edu.ua/article/view/28153 (last address: 06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  59. Prykhodko, I.H. (2006). Russian youth slang of Kyiv (end of XX – beginning of XXI century): abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  60. Protsenko, A.D. (2003). The streets of old Mariupol. Mariupol (in Rus.).
  61. Ryzhchenko, O.V. (2008). Slang and jargon: problems of definition. Ukrainian meaning: Popular science linguo-cultural quarterly, 1, 59 – 64 (in Ukr.).
  62. Ruda, O. (2015). Language preferences of Kyivites today. Ukraina: narracje, języki, historie. (pp. 205 – 217). Wroclaw (in Ukr.).
  63. Rudenko, S.M., Kondratenko, T.S. (2016). Kharkiv dialectisms, archaisms and historicisms. Trends and prospects for the formation of professional vocabulary (pp. 104 – 109). Irpin (in Ukr.).
  64. Sakharova, O.V. (2001). Linguistic stereotypes of modern Kyiv (sociolinguistic aspect). Scientific heritage of Professor S. V. Semchinsky and modern philology. Part 2 (pp. 337 – 343). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  65. Sakharova, O.V. (2002). Conflict component of spontaneous urban dialogue. Functional linguistics: Results and prospects (pp. 233 – 235). Yalta (in Ukr.).
  66. Sidorenko, Ye.N. (2013). Nomination processes in polylingual ergonomics of Donetsk region: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Donetsk (in Rus.).
  67. Sikora, H. (2016). The text of the city as a linguistic phenomenon. Ukrainska mova, 4, 122 – 135 (in Ukr.).
  68. Siriniok, K. (2005). Youth slang as a component of the common language culture of nation. Ukrainian language and literature at school, 5, 69 – 70 (in Ukr.).
  69. Skliar, V. (2008). Assimilation and educational level, or Something about the types of language behavior of Ukrainians. Urok ukrainskoi, 1 – 2, 6 – 12 (in Ukr.).
  70. Dictionary of the youth slang of Kiev (2006). L.A. Kudriavtseva, I.H. Prikhodko (comp.). Kyiv (in Rus.).
  71. Dictionary of criminal slang (1996). O.I. Popovchenko (comp.). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  72. Dictionary of modern Ukrainian slang (2006). T.M. Kondratiuk (comp.). Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  73. Sokolova, S.O. (2014). Polylingual language landscape of the city in the perception of Kyiv residents. Linguistic and conceptual pictures of the world. Vol. 48 (pp. 406 – 414). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  74. Stavytska, L.O. (2003). A short dictionary of slang vocabulary of the Ukrainian language. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  75. Stavytska, L. (2008). Ukrainian language without taboo. Dictionary of obscene language and its equivalents. Obscenisms, euphemisms, sexualisms. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  76. Stavytska, L.O. (2000). Urban forms of language communication in the works of Panas Myrny. Panas Peace and literary process (p. 111 – 114). Poltava (in Ukr.).
  77. Stavytska, Lesya. (2005). Argo, jargon, slang: Social differentiation of the Ukrainian language. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  78. Stavytska, L., Trub, V. (2007). Surzhyk: myth, language, communication. Ukrainian-Russian bilingualism: Linguo-sociocultural aspects. Collection of scientific works (pp. 31 – 120). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  79. Stepanov, Ye. (2006). The language of the city as a sociolinguistic problem. Bulletin of Lviv University. Philology series. 38. Part II (pp. 65 – 71) (in Ukr.).
  80. Stepanov, Ye.M. (2010). Model and methodology of urban linguistic research in Ukraine. Sociolinguistic studies (p 115 – 123). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  81. Stepanov, Ye.M. (2004). Russian speech of Odesa. Odesa (in Ukr.).
  82. Stepanov, Ye.M. (2000). Factors of formation of Odesa urban toponimy. Notes on onomastics. Vol. 4 ( 12 – 23). Odesa(in Rus.).
  83. Taranenko, O. (2004). Prostorichchya. Ukrainian language: encyclopedia (pp. 536 – 537). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  84. Taranenko, O. (2004). Surzhyk. Ukrainian language: encyclopedia (pp. 665 – 668). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  85. Types of language behavior in the modern Slavic bilingual metropolis (2013). S. Sokolova, V. Trub, L. Masenko, O. Danylevska, O. Ruda. Ukrainian horizons: reports of the XV International Congress of Slavists. Vol. 6, part 1. Linguistics (p 173– 196). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  86. Trub, V.M. (2000). The phenomenon of surzhyk as a form of prostorichchya in a situation of bilingualism. Movoznavstvo, 1, 46 – 58 (in Ukr.).
  87. Fursa O.S., Mosenkis Yu.L. (2008). Ukrainian youth slang as a dynamic phenomenon: state and prospects of research, language contacts, branches of slang. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  88. Khavkina, L. (2010). Modern Ukrainian advertising myth. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  89. Lviv lexicon: seriously and jokingly (2012). Edition 2nd, add. and corr. N. Hobzey, O. Simovych, T. Yastremska, H. Dydyk-Meush. Lviv (in Ukr.).
  90. Tsar, I.M. (2016). Lexical features of everyday Ukrainian speech of young Kyiv residents. Language and society, 7, 67 – Lviv (in Ukr.).
  91. Tsilyna, M.M. (2006). Kyiv ergonims: structure, semantics, functioning: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  92. Chernychko, Stepan. Language policy and language landscape of modern Transcarpathia in historical terms (1900 – 1944). URL: http://real.mtak.hu/23622/1/Csernicsko.pdf (last address: 06.06.2021) (in Ukr.).
  93. Sherekh, Yu. (1951). Essay on the modern Ukrainian literary language. Munich (in Ukr.).
  94. Shestakova, S.O. (2002). Lexico-semantic innovations in the system of modern Ukrainian nomination (on the material of ergonims and pragmonims): abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  95. Shovgun, N.O. (2000). Formation of Ukrainian slang in the speech activity of small social groups: abstract of the diss. (PhD in Philology). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  96. Shumarova, N.P. (2010). The language of the city in the sociolinguistic dimension. Language, society, journalism (pp. 10 – 17). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  97. Shumarova, N.P. (1992). Linguistic behavior of Kyiv residents: sociolinguistic aspect. Movoznavstvo, 4, 11 – 17 (in Ukr.).
  98. Shumarova, N.P. (1996). On the development of the language situation in Kiev. Language and culture: IV international conference: materials. Part 2 (pp. 183– 197). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  99. Shchepotiev, V. (1927). The language of our students. Ethnographic bulletin. 3 (pp. 76 – 81). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  100. Pavlenko, A. (2010). Linguistic Landscape of Kiev, Ukraine: a diachronic study. Linguistic landscape in the city. Eds. Shohamy E., Ben-Rafael E. Multilingual Matters, 133 – 150 (in Eng.).
  101. Rudnyckyj, J. (1943). Lemberger Ukrainische Stadtmundart (Znesinnja). Berlin (in Germ.).