LINGUOIMAGOLOGICAL RECEPTION OF THE FIGURE OF A. KRYMSKYI IN DOCUMENTARY FILM TEXT

Anhelina GANZHA,
PhD in Philology, Senior researcher of the Department of stylistics, language culture and sociolinguistics,
Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine;
4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine;
e-mail: ganzhalina@ukr.net
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-5306

Heading: AHATANHEL KRYMSKYI: ASPECTS OF PERSONALITY
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract
The article proposes the author’s linguoimological reception of the figure of Ahatanhel Krymskyi in documentary media products “Crimean tome” (2013), “Ahatanhel Krymskyi. Writing history” (2018), “Ahatanhel Krymskyi. From memories of a true friend” (2021).
The key concepts of linguoimagology – the self-image (the image of “one’s own”) and the hetero-image (the image of “others”) – are the basis of linguistic imagological interpretation of the text and highlight the specifics of the linguistic picture of the human world. In the researched media products we record purposeful attempts of documentary authors to project the image of Ahatanhel Krymskyi on the identification of self-image (image of one’s own) and hetero-image (image of another). Note that in the gradual structure of the heteroimage, in contrast to the traditional for Ukrainians fear and caution in relation to “foreign”, for a prominent scientist dominates the segment of “other”, interaction with which – new opportunities, so Krymskyi always interested multicultural dialogue – scientific, artistic, everyday. The creators of image media products use as a powerful axiological and ideological tool the deliberately chosen Ukrainocentrism of the genius orientalist against the background of his non-Ukrainian origin. Linguoimagological reception of the figure of Ahatanhel Krymskyi in documentaries reveals as yet unexplored aspects of the worldview and scientific universalism of the scientist, opens new perspectives for linguistic and scientific studies.

Key words: linguoimagology, Ahatanhel Krymskyi,  media product, image, self-image, hetero-image, multicultural language personality.

Key words: linguoimagology, Ahatanhel Krymskyi, ethnotype, multicultural language personality.

REFERENCES

1. Bohdan, S. (2008) Lesia Ukrainka’s epistolary dialogues as a source of reconstruction of stereotypes of interpersonal communication and images of communicators: Ahatanhel Krymskyi. Lesia Ukrainka i suchasnist.  vol. 4, b. 2, 315-337. Lutsk (in Ukr.).
2. Bryk, M. M. (2020). Verbalization of variants of perception of the image of Turkey by representatives of Russian and English linguistic cultures (based on the novels of bilingual writers): avtoref. dys. … kand. filol. nauk. Kyiv. (in Ukr.).
3. Ivanova, L.P. (2012) Imagology as a new direction in linguistics. Mova i kultura, 73–76. Kyiv (in Rus.).
4. Ivanova, L.P. (2014). Linguistic imagology as a cornerstone of the theory of communication and practical foundations of intercultural communication. Kommunykatyvnye issledovanyia, 1, 9–16. (in Rus.).
5. Kamalova, S. D. (2020). The image of “strangers” in multicultural literature from the standpoint of linguistic imagology (on the material of English-language fiction about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict): Diss. … cand. philol. sciences. Moscow (in Rus.).
6. Omelchuk, V. V. (Ed.) (2020). Eastern traditions of state formation Naukova seriia: Svitovi tradytsii derzhavnoho upravlinnia: Vyp. ІХ: Naukovyi zbirnyk na chest 150 richnytsi vid dnia narodyn Ahatanhela Krymskoho. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
7. Tupchiy, O.V. (2018). The image of England in the n language consciousness of the late XVI – first half of the XIX century: linguoimagological aspect: Dis. … cand. philol. science. Kyiv (in Ukr.).