• info@ks.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044) 278-42-81
  • Print ISSN 0201-419Х
  • e-ISSN 2708-9827
» Journal Issues » 2019 » Journal Culture Of The Word - №90 » Abstract: Lingocultural concept “Kyiv” in Mykola Zerovʼs poetic language

Abstract: Lingocultural concept “Kyiv” in Mykola Zerovʼs poetic language

Culture of the word, 2019, № 90
UDC 811.161

Alyona PALASH,
Department of stylistics, language culture and sociolinguistics at the Institute of the Ukrainian Language of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine
Е-mail: palash706@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-9906

Heading: Word in poetic
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article deals with the linguocultural analysis of the Kyiv concept in M. Zerovʼs linguistic thinking; formation of signs of poetic concept is traced; the reproduction of the description of Kyiv, the princes who ruled in the times of Kyivska Rusʼ, the individualization of the language style of M. Zerov in expressive and imaginative means; the contribution of neoclassics to the development and enrichment of the Ukrainian language is analyzed. The focus is on the contextual-semantic structure of Kyiv tokens in the language of the writer; the lexical-semantic variants (LSW) are considered: 1) the city; 2) the state; 3) state power; 4) residents of the city; given examples and analyzed LSV tokens Kyiv. The peripheral zones of the semantic-conceptual field in which there are microfields (cognitive codes) are investigated; special features of the conceptual sphere of M. Zerov; the chronotype of Kyiv, which is defined by real time intervals, is characterized; the juxtaposition of Kyiv in the two temporal planes of the past and the present is due to the fact that the present is conceived by Zerov not as a total renewal of the old, which was widespread in Soviet poetry, but as destruction, and the past – as the need to preserve the spiritual and moral potential of man and through him – as a prospect into the future.

Keywords: concept, linguistic picture of the world, poetic concept, idiostyle, microfields, conceptosphere, proper names.

REFERENCES
  1. Askoldov, S. A. (1997). Concept and word. Russian Literature. From the theory of literature to the structure of text. Anthology. P. 267 – 279. Moscow (in  Rus.)
  2. Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language: in 11 vol. (1970 – 1980). Kyiv: Scientific Thought (in Ukr.)
  3. Fisak, I. V. (2014). Category «Concept» in modern scientific discourse. Philological Sciences, 17, 6877 (in Ukr.)
  4. Holubovska, I. O. (2016). Modern Ukrainian linguoconceptology: state and prospects of development. Actual problems of philology and translation studies. Aug. X. Vol. 1. P. 151 159 (in Ukr.)
  5. Kalashnyk, V. S. (2001). Figurative-semantic unity as a means and sign in the poetic linguistic picture of the world. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University. Series: Philology. № 519. Aug. 32. P. 311 (in Ukr.)
  6. Kyiv Neoclassics: Anthology. (2015). Kyiv (in Ukr.)
  7. Litiaha, V. (2013). «Concept» in the paradigm of modern linguistic research. Bulletin of the T. Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 1, 48 50 (in Ukr.)
  8. Nikonova, V. H. (2017). Art concepts in the tragedies of Shakespeare: field structure. URL: http://shakespeare.zp.ua/texts.item (in Ukr.)
  9. Zerov, M. (1990). Works: In 2 v. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Dnipro (in Ukr.)